Watch now (3 mins) | “We observed a higher risk of test positivity after vaccination ... which is contrary to evidence reported by the UK Office of National Statistics.”
Ok but now we need to have some studies about reinfection rates comparing vaxxed and unvaxxed. Almost everyone has had it now and the vaxxed who have had it think they have hybrid immunity now, which is better. We know that isn't true but they need to see it so that they will stop getting injected.
You misquoted the original, seriously changing the meaning: Surprisingly, we observed a highER risk of test positivity after vaccination with one or two doses across ALL BMI groups, which is contrary to evidence reported by the UK ONS (Office of National Statistics).
We may have a window of opportunity to have valuable data released in Alberta now that Danielle Smith is in, and Deena Hinshaw is out. Health Alberta stopped publishing vaccine outcomes a few months ago ( gee, I wonder why? ) at a point when the population adjusted numbers showed more people dying of covid in the 3 dose group, than the unvaccinated group.
Then there is the whole issue of grouping the people within 14 days of the first shot with the unvaccinated when showing the numbers for vaccine outcomes. Everyone is doing this as far as I know. If Danielle Smith is the real deal, making this data public would be a major priority I guess we'll see soon enough.
I’d like to hear from the respected physicians like Drs Malone, McCullough, Atlas as to what they think might be the immunological mechanisms for this “negative efficacy.” Their insights would be very valuable.
His actions are perfect to make people believe he is a true dissident doc. Sorry, I'm not buying it. It's the same kind of out front lies that Heritage Foundation and the Federalist Society use, and there are dozens more I could name who have already been exposed.
It doesn't matter to me who you laud as a true soldier for truth, but in this case, I know what I know and so do a lot of other dissident docs.
Now we must address the fact that the methods used to isolate the virus, or whatever is believed (because one cannot even call it a hypothesis) to cause illness, are flawed and based on a supposition. An excellent source of information are Mike Donio, Dr. Andy Kaufman, and Dr. Mark and Sam Bailey. These individuals and the population is growing, are disproving medical dogma.
COVID Injections Crash and Burn – Negative Efficacy – “It’s Causing Your Infection”
It’s all falling apart. Just waiting for it to go mainstream.
Everyone knows. It’s just a question of when.
Ok but now we need to have some studies about reinfection rates comparing vaxxed and unvaxxed. Almost everyone has had it now and the vaxxed who have had it think they have hybrid immunity now, which is better. We know that isn't true but they need to see it so that they will stop getting injected.
You misquoted the original, seriously changing the meaning: Surprisingly, we observed a highER risk of test positivity after vaccination with one or two doses across ALL BMI groups, which is contrary to evidence reported by the UK ONS (Office of National Statistics).
We may have a window of opportunity to have valuable data released in Alberta now that Danielle Smith is in, and Deena Hinshaw is out. Health Alberta stopped publishing vaccine outcomes a few months ago ( gee, I wonder why? ) at a point when the population adjusted numbers showed more people dying of covid in the 3 dose group, than the unvaccinated group.
Then there is the whole issue of grouping the people within 14 days of the first shot with the unvaccinated when showing the numbers for vaccine outcomes. Everyone is doing this as far as I know. If Danielle Smith is the real deal, making this data public would be a major priority I guess we'll see soon enough.
At least she had the good sense to send Deena Hinshaw packing. https://voicesofreason.substack.com/p/time-to-say-goodbye-to-deena-hinshaw
You betcha. Death don't have no mercy in this land.
I’d like to hear from the respected physicians like Drs Malone, McCullough, Atlas as to what they think might be the immunological mechanisms for this “negative efficacy.” Their insights would be very valuable.
thehighwire.com and icandecide.org !
Well, at least they tried. (eye roll)
His actions are perfect to make people believe he is a true dissident doc. Sorry, I'm not buying it. It's the same kind of out front lies that Heritage Foundation and the Federalist Society use, and there are dozens more I could name who have already been exposed.
It doesn't matter to me who you laud as a true soldier for truth, but in this case, I know what I know and so do a lot of other dissident docs.
I don't trust Robert Malone....feel he's controlled opposition.
https://dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/EntryId/4421/Dr-Robert-Malone-A-Risk-Analysis.aspx
This is great. Very reputable journals. Finally.
Now we must address the fact that the methods used to isolate the virus, or whatever is believed (because one cannot even call it a hypothesis) to cause illness, are flawed and based on a supposition. An excellent source of information are Mike Donio, Dr. Andy Kaufman, and Dr. Mark and Sam Bailey. These individuals and the population is growing, are disproving medical dogma.
If experiencing death is on your bucket list then by all means get the jab...
https://youtu.be/7rfIyTVYsZA